Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Intublade Co. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the application is being reviewed by a single individual. The prosecution is organized across 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the company's filing in the Communications sector is situated within a specific technical category.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents the highest concentration of workload for any single examiner, accounting for the entirety of the 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution outcome depends on the review of this individual.
The use of 1 distinct art unit for 1 pending office action indicates a high degree of technical focus within the Communications field. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company can maintain a singular and consistent dialogue with the patent office. The presence of 1 busiest examiner pending office action under MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM provides a point of total consolidation for the company's current prosecution efforts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM | 1 | 33.3% | +80.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19017916 | AI-ENHANCED DEPTH PERCEPTION AND ANATOMICAL HIGHLIGHTING SYSTEM FOR VIDEO-ASSISTED MEDICAL PROCEDURES | MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19017916 | AI-ENHANCED DEPTH PERCEPTION AND ANATOMICAL HIGHLIGHTING SYSTEM FOR VIDEO-ASSISTED MEDICAL PROCEDURES | MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2611 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19017916 | AI-ENHANCED DEPTH PERCEPTION AND ANATOMICAL HIGHLIGHTING SYSTEM FOR VIDEO-ASSISTED MEDICAL PROCEDURES | MCCOY, AIDAN WILLIAM | 2611 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 13, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIntublade Co. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Aidan William Mccoy has the most, with 1 of Intublade Co.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
