Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Inventus Engineering GmbH

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Inventus Engineering GmbH has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each of the 3 pending matters is being handled by a different examiner in a different specialized unit of the USPTO. The involvement of 3 distinct art units indicates that the company's filings in the transportation sector cover different technical classifications requiring different examiner expertise.

GYAWALI, BIPIN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 3 distinct examiners assigned to 3 pending office actions, the workload is spread evenly across the USPTO staff. This lack of concentration means that the company must navigate 3 different individual examination styles simultaneously. Because each examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, no single individual has a dominant influence over the portfolio's current status. Practitioners should prepare for 3 separate prosecution tracks, each governed by the specific standards of 3 distinct art units and the individual preferences of 3 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GYAWALI, BIPIN 1 59.4% +0.7%
LEWIS, TISHA D 1 87.7% +9.6%
RUSHING, JR, BOBBY 1 76.5% +12.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18573462 DEVICE WITH A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL BRAKING DEVICE AND METHOD LEWIS, TISHA D 1d overdue
18688640 METHOD FOR OPERATING AN INPUT DEVICE AND INPUT DEVICE GYAWALI, BIPIN —
18550165 OPERATING DEVICE WITH AT LEAST ONE PIVOTABLE OPERATING LEVER RUSHING, JR, BOBBY —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18550165 OPERATING DEVICE WITH AT LEAST ONE PIVOTABLE OPERATING LEVER RUSHING, JR, BOBBY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2625 1
3619 1
3616 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18688640 METHOD FOR OPERATING AN INPUT DEVICE AND INPUT DEVICE GYAWALI, BIPIN 2625 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 01, 2024
18573462 DEVICE WITH A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL BRAKING DEVICE AND METHOD LEWIS, TISHA D 3619 §102§103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Dec 22, 2023
18550165 OPERATING DEVICE WITH AT LEAST ONE PIVOTABLE OPERATING LEVER RUSHING, JR, BOBBY 3616 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2023

Managing Inventus Engineering GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Inventus Engineering GmbH have?

Inventus Engineering GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Inventus Engineering GmbH applications?

Bipin Gyawali has the most, with 1 of Inventus Engineering GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Inventus Engineering GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month