Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days
Inventus Holdings LLC manages 5 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, meaning every pending action is being reviewed by a different person in a different unit. This one-to-one ratio between the 5 pending actions and the 5 distinct examiners indicates a highly decentralized prosecution landscape.
The busiest examiner, POE, KEVIN T, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 5 distinct examiners for the 5 total actions, no single examiner handles more than one case for the company at this time. This distribution requires the company to navigate 5 different sets of examiner preferences simultaneously within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The use of 5 distinct art units further suggests that the company's filings are technically diverse, requiring a strategy that accounts for the specific practices of 5 different units. No single examiner or art unit has oversight of more than one pending action in this data set.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (40%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POE, KEVIN T | 1 | 39.5% | +16.1% |
| DYER, ANDREW R | 1 | 59.6% | +39.3% |
| SWAMY, ARJUN RAJ | 1 | — | — |
| CRUM, JACOB R | 1 | 74.6% | +28.2% |
| AYALA, KEVIN ALEXIS | 1 | 63.8% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16601088 | AUTHORIZING AND VALIDATING REMOVABLE STORAGE FOR USE WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRCTURE COMPUTING SYSTEMS | AYALA, KEVIN ALEXIS | 27d |
| 19007275 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BASIS AVOIDANCE FOR ENERGY GENERATION SITES | POE, KEVIN T | — |
| 18928269 | DYNAMIC LOSS COMPENSATION FOR POWER CONTROL APPARATUS | DYER, ANDREW R | — |
| 18916435 | DETERMINING REPORTABLE EVENTS OF EVENT LOGS FOR A NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION PLANT | SWAMY, ARJUN RAJ | — |
| 18734136 | PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE FOR ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS | CRUM, JACOB R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16601088 | AUTHORIZING AND VALIDATING REMOVABLE STORAGE FOR USE WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRCTURE COMPUTING SYSTEMS | AYALA, KEVIN ALEXIS | 27d |
| 19007275 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BASIS AVOIDANCE FOR ENERGY GENERATION SITES | POE, KEVIN T | — |
| 18928269 | DYNAMIC LOSS COMPENSATION FOR POWER CONTROL APPARATUS | DYER, ANDREW R | — |
| 18734136 | PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE FOR ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS | CRUM, JACOB R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3692 | 1 |
| 3662 | 1 |
| 2654 | 1 |
| 2841 | 1 |
| 2496 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19007275 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BASIS AVOIDANCE FOR ENERGY GENERATION SITES | POE, KEVIN T | 3692 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 31, 2024 |
| 18928269 | DYNAMIC LOSS COMPENSATION FOR POWER CONTROL APPARATUS | DYER, ANDREW R | 3662 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
| 18916435 | DETERMINING REPORTABLE EVENTS OF EVENT LOGS FOR A NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION PLANT | SWAMY, ARJUN RAJ | 2654 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18734136 | PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE FOR ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS | CRUM, JACOB R | 2841 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 05, 2024 |
| 16601088 | AUTHORIZING AND VALIDATING REMOVABLE STORAGE FOR USE WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRCTURE COMPUTING SYSTEMS | AYALA, KEVIN ALEXIS | 2496 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Oct 14, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialInventus Holdings LLC has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.
Kevin T Poe has the most, with 1 of Inventus Holdings LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
