Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Iolera Holdings Pte. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a highly focused prosecution effort for the portfolio. By having a limited active workload, the company can dedicate its legal resources to the specific concerns of the assigned examiner rather than managing multiple conflicting rejections.
The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that the matter is governed by the technical standards of that group. The busiest examiner, ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This means that the entirety of the company's current pending workload is under the review of this individual. For a practitioner, this concentration in 1 art unit with 1 examiner simplifies the administrative burden but increases the importance of this specific relationship for the portfolio's success.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | 1 | 69.2% | +28.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19178762 | PUTATIVE ENERGY FIELD ANALYSIS USING NON-THERMAL PLASMA ARRAY | ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19178762 | PUTATIVE ENERGY FIELD ANALYSIS USING NON-THERMAL PLASMA ARRAY | ROZANSKI, MICHAEL T | 3797 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 14, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial