Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Iot Diagnostics currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution profile shows a focus on the 1 pending office action, with no diversification across different examiners at this time. This 1 distinct examiner is the only one currently reviewing the company's applications.
KURTZ, BENJAMIN M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action under review. This figure for the busiest examiner pending count matches the total number of pending office actions for the company. Consequently, the progress of the company's current pending inventory is dependent on the review process of the 1 distinct examiner. The presence of only the 1 distinct art unit further emphasizes the nature of the company's current patent office activity.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KURTZ, BENJAMIN M | 1 | 56.8% | +17.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18143966 | FLUID POWER SYSTEM MONITORING BASED ON FLUID PARAMETERS | KURTZ, BENJAMIN M | 42d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18143966 | FLUID POWER SYSTEM MONITORING BASED ON FLUID PARAMETERS | KURTZ, BENJAMIN M | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1779 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18143966 | FLUID POWER SYSTEM MONITORING BASED ON FLUID PARAMETERS | KURTZ, BENJAMIN M | 1779 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 42d | Pending | May 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial