Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Iotic Labs Limited currently has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit and is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, AGUIAR, JOHNNY B. As the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, AGUIAR, JOHNNY B is the sole official responsible for the company's active prosecution. This structure allows for a focused approach to resolving the pending matter.
The relationship of pending actions to examiners ensures that the company's legal strategy is not divided across multiple officials. Because the application is situated within the Networking & Security sector, the prosecution will be governed by the specific technical standards of that area. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit further simplifies the administrative requirements for the company.
Practitioners should focus on the specific examination patterns of AGUIAR, JOHNNY B to navigate the 1 pending office action effectively. Since this is the only active case, the applicant can provide a comprehensive response without the need to coordinate with other ongoing matters. This centralized prosecution environment is ideal for a targeted intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGUIAR, JOHNNY B | 1 | 80.4% | +19.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18869764 | CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTIONALITY OF IOT DEVICES | AGUIAR, JOHNNY B | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18869764 | CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTIONALITY OF IOT DEVICES | AGUIAR, JOHNNY B | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2447 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18869764 | CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTIONALITY OF IOT DEVICES | AGUIAR, JOHNNY B | 2447 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial