Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ip21Po Innovations Limteed currently faces 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, LIEB, JEANETTE M, who holds the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit indicates that the current prosecution effort is highly localized within the patent office's organizational structure. The strategy remains streamlined as all current activity is confined to this 1 interaction.
For the practitioner, managing 1 pending office action involves a focus on the requirements of 1 distinct examiner. There is no need to reconcile conflicting guidance from multiple art units or different personnel. Because the portfolio is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the technical arguments can be precisely calibrated to the known standards of that unit. This focused approach reduces the complexity of managing the pending patent application. By addressing the 1 busiest examiner pending office action, the legal team can prioritize the specific feedback provided by the examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIEB, JEANETTE M | 1 | 79.9% | +17.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18266571 | NOVEL COMPOUNDS | LIEB, JEANETTE M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18266571 | NOVEL COMPOUNDS | LIEB, JEANETTE M | 1654 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial