Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ip3 2025 Series 925 Of Allied Security Trust I has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, providing separate reviews and independent evaluations for each case. Both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the software technologies being patented are technically related and fall under a single set of classification standards.
Olisa Anwah is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 pending action. With 2 pending office actions in 1 art unit, the company can analyze the unit's specific trends and prior art preferences to inform its overall prosecution strategy. The involvement of 2 distinct examiners means that while the technical field is narrow, the company must still navigate different individual perspectives and examination styles within the Computing & Software sector.
Practitioners can leverage the technical consistency of the 1 art unit to develop a unified set of arguments, while still tailoring their approach to the specific feedback from Olisa Anwah and the other assigned examiner. Having 2 pending office actions provides the company with multiple opportunities to secure patent protection for its software innovations. The outcome of these actions will be a key indicator of the company's success in navigating the complex regulatory environment of the computing and software field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANWAH, OLISA | 1 | 89.0% | +4.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19064802 | Sharing Locations where Binaural Sound Externally Localizes | ANWAH, OLISA | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19064802 | Sharing Locations where Binaural Sound Externally Localizes | ANWAH, OLISA | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial