Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ipar LLC maintains a portfolio with 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. All 3 actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. Despite this concentration, the company interacts with 3 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being reviewed by a different individual.
KUEN S LU is identified as the busiest examiner, and he is responsible for 1 pending office action. This reflects the distribution of the 3 pending actions across the 3 distinct examiners. Because the entire portfolio resides in 1 art unit, the primary variable in prosecution outcomes will be the individual preferences of these examiners rather than differing art unit policies.
The presence of 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems space suggests a specific intellectual property strategy. By operating within 1 art unit, Ipar LLC faces a unified set of examination guidelines, even as 3 distinct examiners provide individual perspectives on the claims. This structure allows for an analysis of art unit trends while managing the separate examiner relationships.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LU, KUEN S | 1 | 85.4% | +15.1% |
| ZAIDI, SYED A | 1 | 81.9% | +12.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19290594 | Systems and Methods for Providing Expert Thread Search Results | LU, KUEN S | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19202226 | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Management of Geo-Fenced and Geo-Targeted Media Content and Content Alternatives in Content Management Systems | ZAIDI, SYED A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19290594 | Systems and Methods for Providing Expert Thread Search Results | LU, KUEN S | — |
| 19202226 | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Management of Geo-Fenced and Geo-Targeted Media Content and Content Alternatives in Content Management Systems | ZAIDI, SYED A | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19290594 | Systems and Methods for Providing Expert Thread Search Results | LU, KUEN S | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 05, 2025 |
| 19202226 | Systems and Methods for Dynamic Management of Geo-Fenced and Geo-Targeted Media Content and Content Alternatives in Content Management Systems | ZAIDI, SYED A | — | §101§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial