Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Iqair AG currently manages a focused patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio shows a concentrated prosecution environment, as evidenced by 1 pending office action. This single active matter indicates a narrow window of current interaction with the patent office, requiring precise management of the specific legal requirements associated with this technology sector.
The organizational structure of the portfolio is characterized by the presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved in the current workload. This uniformity suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are localized within a specific regulatory niche rather than being spread across multiple examination divisions. Practitioners can expect a consistent procedural experience due to this lack of administrative variety.
DIETERLE, JENNIFER M is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because this individual is responsible for the entirety of the pending workload, the outcome of the portfolio's current prosecution phase depends on the interactions with this single examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style and prior rulings of this examiner to navigate the pending requirements effectively.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 1 | 66.1% | +27.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18500248 | Air purification device with optimized air guidance | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 45d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18500248 | Air purification device with optimized air guidance | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 45d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18500248 | Air purification device with optimized air guidance | DIETERLE, JENNIFER M | 1776 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 45d overdue | Pending | Nov 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial