Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Isola Therapeutics Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Isola Therapeutics Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, yet they are all concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This unique distribution suggests that while the company is interacting with multiple examiners, its current patenting activity is focused on a very specific technical niche within the medical device field.

EMILY LOUISE SCHMIDT is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending action is among the total 3 pending office actions in the portfolio. Because all 3 pending actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, the company may benefit from a consistent set of art unit standards even as it navigates the different perspectives of 3 distinct examiners. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the technical scope of the prosecution effort.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE 1 58.4% +36.6%
BRANDT, DAVID NELSON 1 70.4% +49.7%
TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA 1 77.4% +31.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18680666 INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE —
18444169 DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY BRANDT, DAVID NELSON —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17795344 TISSUE DOSING FOR INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA 22d
18680666 INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE —
18444169 DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY BRANDT, DAVID NELSON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18680666 INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18444169 DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY BRANDT, DAVID NELSON 3783 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024
17795344 TISSUE DOSING FOR INTRALUMINAL LOCAL DRUG DELIVERY TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA 3783 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jul 26, 2022

Managing Isola Therapeutics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Isola Therapeutics Inc. have?

Isola Therapeutics Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Isola Therapeutics Inc. applications?

Emily Louise Schmidt has the most, with 1 of Isola Therapeutics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Isola Therapeutics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month