Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ithera Medical GmbH currently has 1 pending office action. This action defines the current prosecution landscape for the company. The portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a centralized point of interaction with the patent office for the current pending matter. For a practitioner, the focus is entirely on the pending office action and the specific examiner assigned to it. This streamlined structure allows for a highly focused approach to the company's intellectual property goals.
The data shows 0 distinct art units associated with the pending action. This figure of 0 might be due to the current administrative status of the application or its specific classification within the patent office. MISTRY, ONEAL R is the busiest examiner for Ithera Medical GmbH, being responsible for the pending office action currently on record. This examiner represents the group of active examiners for the company. The lack of multiple art units or examiners simplifies the administrative burden of managing this filing.
The fact that a distinct examiner is managing the pending office action means that the outcome of this interaction is critical for the portfolio. MISTRY, ONEAL R holds the 1 pending action, making this individual the primary focus for any upcoming interviews or responses. The concentration of the pending office action under the examiner simplifies the communication strategy, as there are no competing examiner styles to navigate. With only 1 pending office action, the practitioner can dedicate full attention to the specific requirements and feedback from this single examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MISTRY, ONEAL R | 1 | 87.5% | +11.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18864782 | METHOD OF TRAINING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR RECONSTRUCTING OPTOACOUSTIC AND ULTRASONIC IMAGES AND SYSTEM USING THE TRAINED ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK | MISTRY, ONEAL R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18864782 | METHOD OF TRAINING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR RECONSTRUCTING OPTOACOUSTIC AND ULTRASONIC IMAGES AND SYSTEM USING THE TRAINED ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK | MISTRY, ONEAL R | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18864782 | METHOD OF TRAINING AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR RECONSTRUCTING OPTOACOUSTIC AND ULTRASONIC IMAGES AND SYSTEM USING THE TRAINED ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK | MISTRY, ONEAL R | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial