Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jabil Technology (Wuhan) Ltd. currently has 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 2 pending office actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each application is reviewed by a different individual. Despite the involvement of 2 distinct examiners, the prosecution is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit. This means that while the examiners may have different perspectives, they are likely following the same set of procedural guidelines within that 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is ABDELRAHEEM, MOHAMMED SAID, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly split. For a practitioner, the challenge is to address the individual requirements of 2 distinct examiners while benefiting from the technical consistency of 1 distinct art unit. This structure allows for a focused approach to the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field across the 2 pending office actions. The 1 distinct art unit provides a stable environment for the 2 distinct examiners to conduct their reviews, which can help in maintaining a unified technical narrative for the 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABDELRAHEEM, MOHAMMED SAID | 1 | 89.7% | +12.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18804973 | PLUGGABLE OPTICAL CHANNEL MONITOR | ABDELRAHEEM, MOHAMMED SAID | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18804973 | PLUGGABLE OPTICAL CHANNEL MONITOR | ABDELRAHEEM, MOHAMMED SAID | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18804973 | PLUGGABLE OPTICAL CHANNEL MONITOR | ABDELRAHEEM, MOHAMMED SAID | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial