Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jackson Family Wines Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This single matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner, showing a highly focused point of interaction at the USPTO. The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's current technical focus is concentrated within a specific area of biotechnology.
The busiest examiner for the company is PEEBLES, KATHERINE, who is overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This accounts for the total number of pending office actions currently active for the portfolio. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate success is tied to the specific examination style of PEEBLES, KATHERINE. Practitioners should prioritize a direct and responsive strategy to address the 1 pending office action. The concentration within 1 distinct art unit further suggests that the company is pursuing a targeted intellectual property strategy. Navigating the requirements of the 1 distinct examiner will be the primary objective for the company's legal representatives.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEEBLES, KATHERINE | 1 | 35.5% | +48.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18555277 | POMACE LEACHATE HERBICIDE COMPOSITION AND METHODS | PEEBLES, KATHERINE | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18555277 | POMACE LEACHATE HERBICIDE COMPOSITION AND METHODS | PEEBLES, KATHERINE | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1617 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18555277 | POMACE LEACHATE HERBICIDE COMPOSITION AND METHODS | PEEBLES, KATHERINE | 1617 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Oct 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial