Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SU, SARAH | 1 | 80.1% | +18.2% |
| HO, DAO Q | 1 | 83.3% | +32.3% |
| BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL | 1 | 39.7% | +34.8% |
| CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N | 1 | 28.0% | +43.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18308421 | TASK WINDOW CREATION AND CONFIGURATION | CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18823011 | SECURITY THREAT INVESTIGATION | SU, SARAH | 25d overdue |
| 18735544 | UNIQUE IDENTIFIER ASSIGNATION | HO, DAO Q | 19d overdue |
| 18308421 | TASK WINDOW CREATION AND CONFIGURATION | CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N | 9d |
| 18472983 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTITY AND ACCESS RISK REDUCTION INFORMED BY RISK SIGNALING AND DEVICE POSTURE | BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2431 | 1 |
| 2432 | 1 |
| 2437 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18823011 | SECURITY THREAT INVESTIGATION | SU, SARAH | 2431 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 25d overdue | Pending | Sep 03, 2024 |
| 18735544 | UNIQUE IDENTIFIER ASSIGNATION | HO, DAO Q | 2432 | §103 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | Jun 06, 2024 |
| 18472983 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTITY AND ACCESS RISK REDUCTION INFORMED BY RISK SIGNALING AND DEVICE POSTURE | BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL | 2437 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
| 18308421 | TASK WINDOW CREATION AND CONFIGURATION | CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N | 3623 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | Apr 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial