Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 6 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd. maintains 11 pending office actions across the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 10 distinct examiners, which suggests a broad exposure to different examination styles within the USPTO. The portfolio spans 6 distinct art units, reflecting a diverse range of technical subject matter within the mechanical and medical fields.

RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER is identified as the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 2 busiest examiner pending actions. This distribution indicates that while most examiners are handling only one action each, RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER has a slightly higher concentration of the company's workload. Practitioners should note that the presence of 10 distinct examiners relative to 11 pending office actions minimizes the impact of any single examiner's habits on the overall portfolio.

The presence of 6 distinct art units further suggests that prosecution strategies may need to be tailored to the specific requirements and precedents of multiple specialized units. This organizational spread provides a diversified risk profile for the company's pending US patent applications. Monitoring the specific outcomes from RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER will be critical given the higher volume of cases assigned to this individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (36%)
7
Medium (64%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only6 (55%)
§102 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (27%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 2 72.4% +39.2%
ROBERTS, ANNA L 1 55.7% +39.8%
PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 1 55.4% +35.9%
PORTILLO, JAIRO H 1 53.4% +30.7%
LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 1 69.4% +29.3%
HU, ANN M 1 67.8% +21.5%
BROWN, KYLE MARTZ 1 8.8% +3.1%
PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 1 26.9% +37.5%
ZIEGLER, ABIGAIL M 1 47.3% +46.7%
FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 1 73.2% +20.5%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179849 CATHETER ZIEGLER, ABIGAIL M 31d overdue
18538322 MONITORING DEVICE AND DEFIBRILLATION CONTROL DEVICE LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 15d
18739972 STENT GRAFT PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E —
18250958 ELECTRODE CATHETER BROWN, KYLE MARTZ —
18186014 CATHETER PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179849 CATHETER ZIEGLER, ABIGAIL M 31d overdue
18436204 ELECTRODE CATHETER, POTENTIAL DETECTION DEVICE, AND POTENTIAL DETECTION METHOD PORTILLO, JAIRO H 4d overdue
18538322 MONITORING DEVICE AND DEFIBRILLATION CONTROL DEVICE LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 15d
18086142 CATHETER, BALLOON EXPANSION METHOD, BALLOON COMPRESSION METHOD RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 22d
18069440 POWER SUPPLY DEVICE AND POWER SUPPLY METHOD FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 36d
18483659 BALLOON CATHETER AND BALLOON DILATATION METHOD RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 40d
18788593 BRAIDED STRUCTURE, TUBE STRUCTURE, TUBE STRUCTURE FOR CATHETER, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BRAIDED STRUCTURE ROBERTS, ANNA L 48d
18739972 STENT GRAFT PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3794 4
3791 2
3771 2
3799 1
3796 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18788593 BRAIDED STRUCTURE, TUBE STRUCTURE, TUBE STRUCTURE FOR CATHETER, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BRAIDED STRUCTURE ROBERTS, ANNA L 3791 §102 Final Rejection 48d Pending Jul 30, 2024
18739972 STENT GRAFT PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 3799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18436204 ELECTRODE CATHETER, POTENTIAL DETECTION DEVICE, AND POTENTIAL DETECTION METHOD PORTILLO, JAIRO H 3791 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Feb 08, 2024
18538322 MONITORING DEVICE AND DEFIBRILLATION CONTROL DEVICE LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 3796 §101§112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Dec 13, 2023
18483659 BALLOON CATHETER AND BALLOON DILATATION METHOD RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 3771 §103 Final Rejection 40d Pending Oct 10, 2023
18363238 STENT HU, ANN M 3774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 01, 2023
18250958 ELECTRODE CATHETER BROWN, KYLE MARTZ 3794 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 27, 2023
18186014 CATHETER PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 3794 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2023
18179849 CATHETER ZIEGLER, ABIGAIL M 3794 §102§103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2023
18086142 CATHETER, BALLOON EXPANSION METHOD, BALLOON COMPRESSION METHOD RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Dec 21, 2022
18069440 POWER SUPPLY DEVICE AND POWER SUPPLY METHOD FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL 3794 §103 Non-Final OA 36d Pending Dec 21, 2022

Managing Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd. have?

Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd. has 11 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 10 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd. applications?

Andrew Peter Restaino has the most, with 2 of Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month