Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jarala AS has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to examiner BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending action. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This narrow focus indicates a specific technological application within the mechanical systems field.
Practitioners must tailor their response to the specific preferences of this examiner. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent outcomes depend entirely on the individual discretion of BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY. This lack of examiner diversity means the prosecution strategy must be precisely tailored to the specific requirements of the assigned art unit. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's research and development in this area is highly specialized. Success in this pending action will require a thorough understanding of the specific examination standards applied within this technical group.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY | 1 | 72.0% | +22.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18695379 | Subsea Blower Device | BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18695379 | Subsea Blower Device | BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3671 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18695379 | Subsea Blower Device | BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY | 3671 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial