Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jardin Holdings I LLC has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is highly centralized, involving only one specific application and one point of contact at the patent office. This allows for a very focused legal effort on a single set of claims.
The busiest examiner, LYNCH, CARLY W, manages 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents the full extent of the 1 pending office action for the company. Success in this matter depends on addressing the specific requirements of this examiner within the context of the single art unit. Because there are no other pending actions, the company's current patent office profile is defined entirely by this one interaction. This singular focus requires a precise response to the examiner's findings to ensure the application proceeds toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYNCH, CARLY W | 1 | 51.8% | +48.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19220053 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANT AGRICULTURE | LYNCH, CARLY W | 15d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19220053 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANT AGRICULTURE | LYNCH, CARLY W | 3643 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial