Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jasci LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is being handled by a distinct examiner within a distinct art unit. The narrow scope of the current pending portfolio suggests a highly focused prosecution effort at this stage, concentrated in a single administrative area of the patent office. This concentration allows the company to focus its resources on a single point of contact within the examination corps.
BROWN, LUIS A is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the pending office action currently on record. Because there is only the distinct examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy for the pending matters is entirely dependent on the interactions with this specific individual. This concentration simplifies the logistical demands of monitoring examiner behavior, as the company only needs to track the patterns of the examiner across the art unit. The outcome of the company's current pending workload is tied directly to the feedback and requirements of the single examiner in this specific technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, LUIS A | 1 | 46.2% | +31.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19190171 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS LABOR INTELLIGENT DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT | BROWN, LUIS A | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19190171 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS LABOR INTELLIGENT DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT | BROWN, LUIS A | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19190171 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS LABOR INTELLIGENT DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT | BROWN, LUIS A | 3626 | §101 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Apr 25, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial