Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jbr Franchise Co. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a focus in its current prosecution phase. The case is being processed within 1 distinct art unit, which aligns with the specialized nature of the company's technological field.
BOYCE, ANDRE D is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing the active matter. Since there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner holds the entire workload for the company. This concentration within the 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying examiner behaviors across different departments at this time.
The data shows that with 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate patent office engagement is highly contained. Practitioners working with Jbr Franchise Co. can dedicate their efforts to the specific feedback from BOYCE, ANDRE D. This focused approach is typical for portfolios where the 1 distinct art unit manages the primary technical disclosures and the active matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOYCE, ANDRE D | 1 | 36.4% | +18.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18886605 | DYNAMIC BAGEL PRODUCTION PLANS | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 31d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18886605 | DYNAMIC BAGEL PRODUCTION PLANS | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 31d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18886605 | DYNAMIC BAGEL PRODUCTION PLANS | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 3623 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | Sep 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial