Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jedicare Medical Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This active matter is situated in 1 distinct art unit, showing a concentrated focus on a specific communication technology or protocol. The company's current interaction with the patent office is limited to 1 distinct examiner, which streamlines the prosecution workflow. Such concentration suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific technical advancement rather than a broad array of diverse communications innovations.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is PHAM, NHUT HUY, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As there is only 1 distinct examiner involved in the company's pending actions, the prosecution strategy is focused on addressing the specific requirements of this individual. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current intellectual property does not span multiple technical disciplines within the broader communications field. For a practitioner, this means the prosecution outcome will likely hinge on establishing a consistent understanding with this single examiner, as there are no other active cases to provide alternative pathways for patent allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, NHUT HUY | 1 | 82.1% | +23.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18552077 | SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | PHAM, NHUT HUY | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18552077 | SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | PHAM, NHUT HUY | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18552077 | SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | PHAM, NHUT HUY | 2674 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial