Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jeff Raymond holds a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio has 1 pending office action. This action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the current filing falls into a specific mechanical or transportation technical category. The 1 pending office action represents the current focus of the portfolio's activity at the USPTO.
The prosecution involves a distinct examiner, Alanna Kay Peterson. This individual is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. The activity is currently focused on a single application within one mechanical or transportation art unit. With only one distinct examiner involved, Alanna Kay Peterson is the only official currently reviewing the company's active filings, providing a singular point of contact for the prosecution process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 1 | 41.1% | +27.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19118876 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED FOOD GROWING | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19118876 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED FOOD GROWING | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19118876 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED FOOD GROWING | PETERSON, ALANNA KAY | 3642 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJeff Raymond has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Alanna Kay Peterson has the most, with 1 of Jeff Raymond's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
