Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jelled Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is under review by 1 distinct examiner, Mark C. Clare. Having only 1 pending office action allows the company to focus its intellectual property efforts on a single set of claims and a single examiner's review process. This focused approach can facilitate a more specialized and efficient prosecution process for the pending application.
The prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit. Mark C. Clare is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. This indicates a highly centralized and focused engagement with the patent office. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current technical focus is very specific within the transportation and mechanical systems field. This focused strategy can lead to a more streamlined and efficient examination process for the pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLARE, MARK C | 1 | 14.2% | +19.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18770248 | ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE RETENTION AND ACCESS SYSTEM | CLARE, MARK C | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18770248 | ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE RETENTION AND ACCESS SYSTEM | CLARE, MARK C | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18770248 | ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE RETENTION AND ACCESS SYSTEM | CLARE, MARK C | 3628 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial