Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jessica White's portfolio includes 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution footprint is singular, focusing all resources on a single application and examiner relationship. This concentration indicates a very specific focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts in the Communications field.
CODRINGTON, SHANE WRENSFORD is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, overseeing the 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the only active office action reported for the company. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution environment is highly specific. The outcome of the company's current efforts is tied directly to the interactions with this individual. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of this examiner and the 1 distinct art unit to advance the pending matter effectively.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CODRINGTON, SHANE WRENSFORD | 1 | 83.3% | +20.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18712019 | DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DEFECTS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION DATA | CODRINGTON, SHANE WRENSFORD | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18712019 | DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DEFECTS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION DATA | CODRINGTON, SHANE WRENSFORD | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2667 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18712019 | DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DEFECTS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION DATA | CODRINGTON, SHANE WRENSFORD | 2667 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 16d | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial