Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jewelry Ip LLC is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, with 1 pending office action currently requiring a response. This 1 pending office action defines the current state of the company's patent prosecution. The portfolio is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the company's mechanical or e-commerce innovations. This suggests that the company's intellectual property strategy is currently focused on a single product line or technical solution.
The company's patent applications are being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which creates a singular point of contact at the USPTO. RASHID, ANNA SALEM is the busiest examiner, holding the 1 pending office action. This means the company's immediate success in obtaining a patent is dependent on the specific requirements of this examiner. For the legal team, this concentration simplifies the administrative burden but increases the importance of a successful negotiation with this individual.
The data shows a focused prosecution profile with 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner. Since the busiest examiner pending count is 1, there are no other active office actions to provide alternative paths for patent allowance, making the outcome of this single action critical for the portfolio. This lean structure indicates a highly targeted approach to securing rights in the mechanical and e-commerce space.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 1 | 57.1% | +16.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18459934 | JEWELRY ARTICLE WITH EXTENDER | RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 29d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18459934 | JEWELRY ARTICLE WITH EXTENDER | RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 3677 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d overdue | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial