Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jiangmen Moore Technology Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, indicating different chemical or material classifications. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, with CEFARATTI, JOSEPH ARTHUR identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. This distribution across two examiners and two art units shows a balanced prosecution status for their current filings.
For a practitioner, the involvement of 2 distinct examiners means that each of the 2 pending office actions requires a separate strategy. While CEFARATTI, JOSEPH ARTHUR is the busiest examiner, he only manages one of the active cases. The distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations touch on different specialized fields within chemistry. This requires the legal team to be prepared for different examination styles and technical standards. The current data reflects a prosecution environment where each application is subject to a unique set of examiner expectations, with no concentration of cases in a single art unit or under a single official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEFARATTI, JOSEPH ARTHUR | 1 | — | — |
| ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED | 1 | 64.0% | +37.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18087010 | MAIN UNIT AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE | ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18087010 | MAIN UNIT AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE | ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1749 | 1 |
| 3785 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18759073 | ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC ATOMIZATION DEVICE | CEFARATTI, JOSEPH ARTHUR | 1749 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
| 18087010 | MAIN UNIT AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE | ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED | 3785 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJiangmen Moore Technology Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Joseph Arthur Cefaratti has the most, with 1 of Jiangmen Moore Technology Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
