Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jieyang City Lalale Industry Co. Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. The company's active prosecution is limited to this 1 action, indicating a specific technical focus. This single matter in 1 art unit represents the total current engagement with the patent office, reflecting a targeted strategy in the mechanical systems sector.
The concentration of the company's current prosecution under 1 distinct examiner allows for a direct and singular focus. WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S is the only individual at the patent office currently reviewing the company's pending work. This 1 pending office action is being evaluated within 1 distinct art unit, meaning the company must meet the specific technical requirements of that specialized group. Because there is only 1 action, the company's immediate patenting success depends on the outcome of this single review. This focused activity defines the present state of the company's interaction with the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 1 | 70.2% | +18.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913773 | Buffering Device for the Slide Rail of a Drawer | WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 22d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3637 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18913773 | Buffering Device for the Slide Rail of a Drawer | WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S | 3637 | §102 | Final Rejection | 22d overdue | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial