Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jieyang Tianyi Hardware Products Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, MORGAN, EMILY M. The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit, showing a focused technical scope for the pending application. This 1 pending office action is the only current matter requiring attention from the company's patent team.
The busiest examiner, MORGAN, EMILY M, is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This single action represents the total of 1 pending office action for the company. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution is centralized. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific tendencies of this single examiner. The technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit will be a primary factor in the prosecution strategy. With the entire pending portfolio under MORGAN, EMILY M, the company can focus its resources on a single, targeted response. This streamlined structure in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area allows for a highly efficient patent acquisition process. Practitioners should carefully review the examiner's history to ensure a successful outcome.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORGAN, EMILY M | 1 | 35.7% | +33.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19026084 | American-Style Hinge | MORGAN, EMILY M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19026084 | American-Style Hinge | MORGAN, EMILY M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19026084 | American-Style Hinge | MORGAN, EMILY M | 3677 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJieyang Tianyi Hardware Products Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Emily M Morgan has the most, with 1 of Jieyang Tianyi Hardware Products Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
