Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd. is managing 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners, meaning each pending case is being reviewed by a different individual. The portfolio is also spread through 5 distinct art units, reflecting a high degree of technical diversity in the company's energy storage innovations. This distribution suggests that the company's filings cover a wide array of chemical and material science applications.

SCHWARTZ, PHILIP N is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 5 pending office actions in total, the workload is evenly split among the 5 distinct examiners. This lack of concentration requires the company to navigate five different examination styles and sets of expectations. The 1 busiest examiner pending action indicates that no single official has a dominant influence over the current portfolio.

Operating across 5 distinct art units requires a broad legal strategy that accounts for the specific practices of each unit. The 5 pending office actions represent a significant and varied workload for the company's patent team. Practitioners must be prepared for a range of technical objections and procedural requirements. This profile shows a company with a broad and multifaceted approach to securing intellectual property in the chemistry sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHWARTZ, PHILIP N 1 55.5% +17.0%
ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 1 63.5% +24.2%
EGGERDING, ALIX ECHELMEYER 1 57.4% +17.9%
WILKERSON, JORDAN PATRICK 1 — —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766661 SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, AND ENERGY STORAGE CONTAINER SCHWARTZ, PHILIP N —
18731377 FIXING BRACKET AND INTEGRATED CABINET ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK —
18613134 LIQUID COOLING PLATE AND BATTERY PACK EGGERDING, ALIX ECHELMEYER —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18766661 SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, AND ENERGY STORAGE CONTAINER SCHWARTZ, PHILIP N —
18731377 FIXING BRACKET AND INTEGRATED CABINET ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK —
18613134 LIQUID COOLING PLATE AND BATTERY PACK EGGERDING, ALIX ECHELMEYER —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1749 1
3637 1
1729 1
1783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18766661 SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, AND ENERGY STORAGE CONTAINER SCHWARTZ, PHILIP N 1749 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18731377 FIXING BRACKET AND INTEGRATED CABINET ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 3637 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 03, 2024
18613134 LIQUID COOLING PLATE AND BATTERY PACK EGGERDING, ALIX ECHELMEYER 1729 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18507341 BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK WILKERSON, JORDAN PATRICK 1783 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 13, 2023

Managing Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd. have?

Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd. applications?

Philip N Schwartz has the most, with 1 of Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Jinko Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month