Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Jls Automation

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Jls Automation has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating a moderate level of technical diversity. Each of the 4 pending office actions is assigned to a different person among the several examiners involved. This distribution means that no two actions are being reviewed by the same individual, even within the 3 distinct art units.

CAMPBELL, KEITH is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. Since the cases are handled by 4 distinct examiners, there is no concentration of workload with any single individual. Practitioners will need to navigate the specific requirements of the different units to resolve the active matters. The lack of examiner overlap suggests that the prosecution of each action will be an independent process. Strategy should be customized for each reviewer to ensure the best results across the 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner and the other cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAMPBELL, KEITH 1 89.7% +0.9%
VU, STEPHEN A 1 82.1% +14.8%
KOTIS, JOSHUA G 1 74.4% +57.1%
WEEKS, GLORIA R 1 70.4% +12.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3d overdue
19042099 DRAFT HANDLER SYSTEM CAMPBELL, KEITH —
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3d overdue
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A —
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3731 2
3651 1
3654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19042099 DRAFT HANDLER SYSTEM CAMPBELL, KEITH 3651 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2025
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A 3654 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G 3731 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 11, 2024
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3731 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2019

Managing Jls Automation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Jls Automation have?

Jls Automation has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Jls Automation applications?

Keith Campbell has the most, with 1 of Jls Automation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Jls Automation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month