Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Jls Automation

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Jls Automation maintains a company patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 3 pending office actions. These 3 actions are being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners, indicating that no single examiner is handling multiple pending matters for the firm.

The portfolio is active across 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's mechanical innovations fall into at least two different specialized categories at the patent office. VU, STEPHEN A is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action.

For practitioners, the distribution of 3 pending office actions across 3 examiners and 2 art units requires a coordinated approach. Each of the 3 examiners will have different perspectives on the 2 art units involved. The focus on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering remains the central theme of the company's current prosecution efforts. This structure allows the company to pursue multiple technical paths within the mechanical sector without being limited by the backlog of a single examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VU, STEPHEN A 1 82.1% +14.8%
KOTIS, JOSHUA G 1 74.2% +57.0%
WEEKS, GLORIA R 1 70.4% +12.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3d overdue
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3d overdue
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A —
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3731 2
3654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18773153 Automated Bag Gripping Device VU, STEPHEN A 3654 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18410575 Adaptive Container Loading Assembly KOTIS, JOSHUA G 3731 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 11, 2024
16720539 Method and System For Packaging A Container WEEKS, GLORIA R 3731 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2019

Managing Jls Automation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month