Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jodi Ventures Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution profile is focused on this single active case. This concentration allows for a highly specific approach tailored to the technical standards of the 1 art unit involved.
The busiest examiner for the company is VOORHEES, CATHERINE M, who is overseeing 1 pending office action. This examiner handles the full scope of the company's current pending workload in this technology area. The presence of 1 action within 1 art unit indicates a centralized prosecution path. For the practitioner, the individual examiner's historical data is the primary resource for navigating the current prosecution landscape for this portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 1 | 83.5% | +14.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18621907 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE DELIVERY OF ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO AN ORAL CAVITY | VOORHEES, CATHERINE M | 3792 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial