Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These are assigned to 3 distinct examiners across several art units. This distribution indicates that each of the active actions is being handled by a different examiner in a different group. The 3 distinct art units show a high level of technical variety relative to the small number of actions.

SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because there are many distinct examiners for the total pending actions, the workload is perfectly spread out. Practitioners should be prepared to adapt to separate examination styles across the various groups. This lack of concentration across the active office actions means that the outcome of each case will likely be independent of the others. The technical groups involved represent the diverse technical focus of the company's current active filings. Each case is assigned to a different individual among the examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E 1 73.8% +20.3%
WESTFALL, SARAH ANN 1 5.0% +25.0%
STIGELL, THEODORE J 1 78.3% +14.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18495674 SENSING BIOPSY NEEDLE WESTFALL, SARAH ANN 40d
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E —
18454998 TISSUE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING CANCEROUS CELLS STIGELL, THEODORE J —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18495674 SENSING BIOPSY NEEDLE WESTFALL, SARAH ANN 40d
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E —
18454998 TISSUE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING CANCEROUS CELLS STIGELL, THEODORE J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 1
3791 1
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19117843 ELECTRONICALLY GUIDED PRECISION MEDICAL TARGETING USING NEAR INFRARED FLUORESCENCE IMAGING SEBASTIAN, KAITLYN E 3797 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 02, 2025
18495674 SENSING BIOPSY NEEDLE WESTFALL, SARAH ANN 3791 §103 Final Rejection 40d Pending Oct 26, 2023
18454998 TISSUE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING CANCEROUS CELLS STIGELL, THEODORE J 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 24, 2023

Managing Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. have?

Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc. applications?

Kaitlyn E Sebastian has the most, with 1 of Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month