Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jon Isaac Loevy has 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very focused prosecution profile. The single examiner involved is ZARKA, DAVID PETER, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the pending workload for the portfolio.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit within the Networking & Security area suggests that the filing is situated in a specific technical niche. Because there is only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interaction with ZARKA, DAVID PETER. Practitioners should focus on the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit and the examiner's history to advance this application. This concentrated approach means that the outcome of the current prosecution rests on a single point of contact, requiring a precise and tailored legal argument to navigate the networking and security classification.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 1 | 82.5% | +13.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19140021 | AUTHENTICATED MODIFICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19140021 | AUTHENTICATED MODIFICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2449 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19140021 | AUTHENTICATED MODIFICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 2449 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJon Isaac Loevy has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
David Peter Zarka has the most, with 1 of Jon Isaac Loevy's pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
