Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Jones Lang Lasalle Ip Inc.

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only4 (67%)
§103 only2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 1 65.5% +19.1%
DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 1 22.7% +24.0%
HENRY, MATTHEW D 1 30.2% +20.9%
MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 1 36.2% +56.8%
GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 1 32.7% +31.9%
GUNN, JEREMY L 1 29.2% +45.1%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18228027 METHODS FOR VISUALIZING RELOCATION ANALYTICS AND SYSTEMS THEREOF HENRY, MATTHEW D 8d
18381476 METHODS FOR GENERATING INSIGHT DATA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ANALYTICAL DATA AND DEVICES THEREOF DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 9d
18087422 METHODS FOR ASSESSING AN IMPACT OF A CHANGE IN A SCENARIO ON WORKPLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GUNN, JEREMY L 23d
18130598 METHODS FOR AUTOMATED WORK ORDER NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE) LIMIT OPTIMIZATION AND DEVICES THEREOF MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 28d
18111946 METHODS FOR REAL-TIME OPTIMIZING OF PROCUREMENT OF COMPUTING EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 69d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18228027 METHODS FOR VISUALIZING RELOCATION ANALYTICS AND SYSTEMS THEREOF HENRY, MATTHEW D 8d
18381476 METHODS FOR GENERATING INSIGHT DATA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ANALYTICAL DATA AND DEVICES THEREOF DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 9d
18087422 METHODS FOR ASSESSING AN IMPACT OF A CHANGE IN A SCENARIO ON WORKPLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GUNN, JEREMY L 23d
18130598 METHODS FOR AUTOMATED WORK ORDER NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE) LIMIT OPTIMIZATION AND DEVICES THEREOF MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 28d
18111946 METHODS FOR REAL-TIME OPTIMIZING OF PROCUREMENT OF COMPUTING EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 69d
18623232 METHODS FOR INTELLIGENTLY GENERATING A SEARCH QUERY TO ACCESS DATA AND DEVICES THEREOF CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 70d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 2
3625 2
2152 1
3629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18623232 METHODS FOR INTELLIGENTLY GENERATING A SEARCH QUERY TO ACCESS DATA AND DEVICES THEREOF CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 2152 §103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Apr 01, 2024
18381476 METHODS FOR GENERATING INSIGHT DATA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ANALYTICAL DATA AND DEVICES THEREOF DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 3624 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Oct 18, 2023
18228027 METHODS FOR VISUALIZING RELOCATION ANALYTICS AND SYSTEMS THEREOF HENRY, MATTHEW D 3625 §101 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Jul 31, 2023
18130598 METHODS FOR AUTOMATED WORK ORDER NOT-TO-EXCEED (NTE) LIMIT OPTIMIZATION AND DEVICES THEREOF MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 3629 §101 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Apr 04, 2023
18111946 METHODS FOR REAL-TIME OPTIMIZING OF PROCUREMENT OF COMPUTING EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 3625 §101 Final Rejection 69d Pending Feb 21, 2023
18087422 METHODS FOR ASSESSING AN IMPACT OF A CHANGE IN A SCENARIO ON WORKPLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVICES THEREOF GUNN, JEREMY L 3624 §101 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Dec 22, 2022

Managing Jones Lang Lasalle Ip Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month