Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Joulmine GmbH & Co. Kg currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, GOLOBOY, JAMES C, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused and 1 point of contact for the company's current patent efforts.
Because the portfolio consists of only 1 pending office action, the entire outcome of the company's current prosecution depends on the review of GOLOBOY, JAMES C. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit further emphasizes the technical scope of the 1 pending matter. For practitioners, this means that understanding the specific examiner's history and the standards of this 1 art unit is critical. There is no diversification across examiners or units, so the feedback from this 1 examiner will be the determinant of the portfolio's immediate progress. This streamlined profile allows for a targeted prosecution strategy focused on the preferences and requirements of the assigned examiner and art unit. The 1 pending office action represents the totality of the current workload within the Chemistry & Materials area. Practitioners should prepare for a singular interaction where the 1 examiner's interpretation of the 1 art unit's standards will be the deciding factor.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLOBOY, JAMES C | 1 | 63.7% | +8.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18872715 | Method and plant for recycling carbon-containing composite materials having a carbon-containing matrix material and fibre-, filament- or wire-reinforcement | GOLOBOY, JAMES C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1772 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18872715 | Method and plant for recycling carbon-containing composite materials having a carbon-containing matrix material and fibre-, filament- or wire-reinforcement | GOLOBOY, JAMES C | 1772 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJoulmine GmbH & Co. Kg has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
James C Goloboy has the most, with 1 of Joulmine GmbH & Co. Kg's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
