Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Joylux Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, which indicates a very narrow and focused prosecution path. The alignment of the company's current active application with the identified art unit suggests a specialized technical focus within the medical device sector.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MOON, MATTHEW RYAN, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. As this examiner is the only official currently reviewing the company's pending work, the immediate success of the portfolio depends on the specific examination style of MOON, MATTHEW RYAN. This concentration of responsibility means that the company's legal team can focus their communication on a single point of contact at the USPTO.
Practitioners should consider that having only a single pending office action across the entire portfolio minimizes the complexity of managing response deadlines. However, the lack of diversity in examiners means there is no opportunity to compare different examination approaches within the company's current inventory. The current workload represents the entirety of the company's pending patent challenges.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOON, MATTHEW RYAN | 1 | 58.1% | +60.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18506131 | Light-Emitting Diode and Massage Device for Delivering Focused Light for Vaginal Rejuvenation | MOON, MATTHEW RYAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18506131 | Light-Emitting Diode and Massage Device for Delivering Focused Light for Vaginal Rejuvenation | MOON, MATTHEW RYAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3785 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18506131 | Light-Emitting Diode and Massage Device for Delivering Focused Light for Vaginal Rejuvenation | MOON, MATTHEW RYAN | 3785 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJoylux Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew Ryan Moon has the most, with 1 of Joylux Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
