Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jpw Industries Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, each reviewing a separate application. The portfolio is active in 2 distinct art units, indicating that each pending matter falls into a different technical classification. This variety suggests a diverse technical focus within the mechanical field for the company's current filings.
MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This examiner handles one of the 2 pending office actions, while the other is managed by a different distinct examiner. The presence of 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending office actions requires the applicant to address the specific requirements of different examination groups. This structure means that the prosecution of each matter is entirely independent. Practitioners must tailor their strategies to the individual examiners and art units within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S | 1 | 54.3% | +21.7% |
| HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 1 | 76.4% | +23.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18498582 | WOOD AND METAL WORKING TOOLS HAVING A LOW FRICTION COATING | HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 43d overdue |
| 18768687 | TABLE SAW DUST DEFLECTION SYSTEM | MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3724 | 1 |
| 3723 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18768687 | TABLE SAW DUST DEFLECTION SYSTEM | MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S | 3724 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 10, 2024 |
| 18498582 | WOOD AND METAL WORKING TOOLS HAVING A LOW FRICTION COATING | HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 3723 | §103 | Final Rejection | 43d overdue | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJpw Industries Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jennifer S Matthews has the most, with 1 of Jpw Industries Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
