Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jpw Industries Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 action represents the entirety of the company's active engagement with the patent office. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the pending application. This narrow scope suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are concentrated on a particular innovation. The 1 distinct art unit ensures that the examination remains within a specialized technical division.
1 distinct examiner, HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT, is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action. Because 1 distinct examiner is responsible for the company's only pending matter, the prosecution strategy is entirely focused on the feedback and requirements of this 1 individual. The outcome of the company's current prosecution efforts depends on successfully navigating the examination style of this 1 official. Managing the relationship with this 1 distinct examiner is the primary task for the company's 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 1 | 76.4% | +23.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18498582 | WOOD AND METAL WORKING TOOLS HAVING A LOW FRICTION COATING | HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 43d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18498582 | WOOD AND METAL WORKING TOOLS HAVING A LOW FRICTION COATING | HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT | 3723 | §103 | Final Rejection | 43d overdue | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial