Technology area: Computing & Software
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Juliahub Inc. currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are distributed among 4 distinct examiners. While there are several examiners involved, the cases are concentrated within 3 distinct art units. This indicates that the company's software innovations are being reviewed by a variety of personnel but within a relatively narrow set of administrative departments at the USPTO.
GARNER, CASEY R is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. With the total pending office actions spread across multiple examiners, the workload is decentralized. This requires the company to manage several separate examiner relationships while navigating the requirements of 3 distinct art units. For the practitioner, the challenge lies in addressing the specific feedback of various examiners without the benefit of a primary contact, though the concentration in a few art units may allow for some strategic alignment based on departmental standards.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARNER, CASEY R | 1 | 71.2% | +17.1% |
| MAPAR, BIJAN | 1 | 67.7% | +27.9% |
| LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN | 1 | 63.2% | +14.4% |
| FIGUEROA, KEVIN W | 1 | 70.1% | +20.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18424281 | AUTOMATED SURROGATE TRAINING PERFORMANCE BY INCORPORATING SIMULATOR INFORMATION | GARNER, CASEY R | — |
| 18505733 | TRANSFORMING A MODEL IN A FIRST LANGUAGE TO A SURROGATE IN A SECOND LANGUAGE FOR SIMULATION | MAPAR, BIJAN | — |
| 18136654 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATING QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY (QSP) MODELS | LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN | — |
| 17491823 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF COMPONENT-BASED MODELING USING TRAINED SURROGATES | FIGUEROA, KEVIN W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18424281 | AUTOMATED SURROGATE TRAINING PERFORMANCE BY INCORPORATING SIMULATOR INFORMATION | GARNER, CASEY R | — |
| 18505733 | TRANSFORMING A MODEL IN A FIRST LANGUAGE TO A SURROGATE IN A SECOND LANGUAGE FOR SIMULATION | MAPAR, BIJAN | — |
| 18136654 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATING QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY (QSP) MODELS | LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN | — |
| 17491823 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF COMPONENT-BASED MODELING USING TRAINED SURROGATES | FIGUEROA, KEVIN W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2123 | 1 |
| 2187 | 1 |
| 2148 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18424281 | AUTOMATED SURROGATE TRAINING PERFORMANCE BY INCORPORATING SIMULATOR INFORMATION | GARNER, CASEY R | 2123 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 26, 2024 |
| 18505733 | TRANSFORMING A MODEL IN A FIRST LANGUAGE TO A SURROGATE IN A SECOND LANGUAGE FOR SIMULATION | MAPAR, BIJAN | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 09, 2023 |
| 18136654 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATING QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY (QSP) MODELS | LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN | 2187 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 19, 2023 |
| 17491823 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF COMPONENT-BASED MODELING USING TRAINED SURROGATES | FIGUEROA, KEVIN W | 2148 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJuliahub Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.
Casey R Garner has the most, with 1 of Juliahub Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
