Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Julian Gough currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which means the company's current pending matters are under the review of this individual. The data shows 1 distinct art unit is involved in the prosecution of this portfolio. This count of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technical scope of the pending work is handled by an administrative group within the patent office.
The busiest examiner identified is BARR, MARY EVANGELINE, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner holds the 1 busiest examiner pending office action, their examination history is a factor in the portfolio's progress. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and the 1 pending office action indicates that there is no distribution of work across multiple office sections at this time. Practitioners should monitor the prosecution for Julian Gough in this Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 1 | 36.1% | +32.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18821559 | DETERMINING PHENOTYPE FROM GENOTYPE | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18821559 | DETERMINING PHENOTYPE FROM GENOTYPE | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18821559 | DETERMINING PHENOTYPE FROM GENOTYPE | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 3682 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJulian Gough has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Mary Evangeline Barr has the most, with 1 of Julian Gough's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
