Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Justin Paul Stark

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Justin Paul Stark currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's current patent activity is concentrated in a single technological and administrative sector. The focus on 1 distinct art unit allows for an examination environment where the company can apply targeted arguments within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

The busiest examiner, STERLING, AMY JO, is responsible for the 1 pending office action. As there is only 1 pending action in the entire portfolio, this examiner is the sole point of contact for current prosecution. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination trends within this single art unit. Managing the pending office action with the identified examiner requires attention to individual preferences while benefiting from the shared standards of the art unit. This structure allows the company to focus its resources on the specific requirements of its current mechanical filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STERLING, AMY JO 1 76.6% +10.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19031920 MOUNT FOR HOLDING A HANDHELD DEVICE STERLING, AMY JO —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3631 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19031920 MOUNT FOR HOLDING A HANDHELD DEVICE STERLING, AMY JO 3631 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2025

Managing Justin Paul Stark's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month