Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kairish Innotech Private Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is currently being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated prosecution profile suggests that the company's current efforts at the patent office are focused on a single technical development.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action means that the applicant only needs to navigate the preferences and requirements of one individual. This avoids the administrative burden of managing multiple pending cases across different art units. Practitioners can focus their resources on addressing the specific issues raised in this single 1 distinct art unit.
GRAY, PAUL J is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending office action. As there is only 1 busiest examiner pending, the company's immediate patent outcomes are tied to the decisions of this single examiner. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current workload in this specific technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRAY, PAUL J | 1 | 78.5% | +10.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18252641 | APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR DRUG RECONSTITUTION BY LIQUID TRANSFER | GRAY, PAUL J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18252641 | APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR DRUG RECONSTITUTION BY LIQUID TRANSFER | GRAY, PAUL J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18252641 | APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR DRUG RECONSTITUTION BY LIQUID TRANSFER | GRAY, PAUL J | 3783 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKairish Innotech Private Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Paul J Gray has the most, with 1 of Kairish Innotech Private Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
