Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kaleo Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, representing a focused prosecution effort. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for the company's current active matters, which may reflect a specialized classification for the pending application. This concentration allows for a direct prosecution strategy that is not complicated by multiple art unit standards.
SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action is the only pending office action for the company at this time. Consequently, the company's current interactions with the patent office are limited to this 1 distinct examiner. This requires a specific response strategy tailored to the feedback provided by this examiner to ensure the application progresses efficiently despite the 0 distinct art units currently assigned.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS | 1 | 65.5% | +38.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650596 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT | SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650596 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT | SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18650596 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING A LYOPHILIZED MEDICAMENT | SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS | — | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial