Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kanadevia Corporation maintains a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry and Materials technology area. The portfolio currently includes 2 pending office actions. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, indicating that the company is engaging with multiple perspectives at the patent office.
Both of these matters are being prosecuted within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the 2 pending office actions involve related chemical or material technologies. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is GODO, OLATUNJI A, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This confirms that the workload is split evenly between the 2 distinct examiners.
Practitioners should focus on maintaining technical consistency across the 2 pending office actions, given they reside in 1 distinct art unit. However, because there are 2 distinct examiners, the strategy for each case must be individualized. The success of the current prosecution depends on meeting the specific expectations of GODO, OLATUNJI A and the other assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GODO, OLATUNJI A | 1 | 85.9% | +9.0% |
| CLARY, KAYLA ELAINE | 1 | 66.7% | +25.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18693832 | SOLID STATE BATTERY, SOLID STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND SOLID STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING DEVICE | GODO, OLATUNJI A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18261444 | ELECTROSTATIC FILM FORMATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME | CLARY, KAYLA ELAINE | 54d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1721 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18693832 | SOLID STATE BATTERY, SOLID STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND SOLID STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING DEVICE | GODO, OLATUNJI A | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2024 |
| 18261444 | ELECTROSTATIC FILM FORMATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME | CLARY, KAYLA ELAINE | 1721 | §103 | Final Rejection | 54d | Pending | Jul 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial