Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kando Innovation Limited currently manages 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units. The concentration of the portfolio in the examiner indicates a specific focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts. Practitioners can observe that the prosecution landscape is concentrated, with limited distribution across different technical groups.
The busiest examiner for the company is LEE, LAURA MICHELLE, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this examiner handles the active matter, the company's immediate prosecution strategy depends on the interactions within this specific relationship. Practitioners should note that the examiner and art unit totals represent the total breadth of the company's current engagement with the patent office. This activity allows for a consistent approach to the matters at hand.
The involvement of LEE, LAURA MICHELLE as the busiest examiner means that feedback and requirements originate from this specific source. This structure simplifies the coordination needed to address the busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific examination style of the examiner to advance the pending office action toward allowance. The 0 distinct art units suggests a unique classification for the filing.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, LAURA MICHELLE | 1 | 54.8% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19139752 | APPARATUS FOR STOPPING A CUTTING DISC | LEE, LAURA MICHELLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19139752 | APPARATUS FOR STOPPING A CUTTING DISC | LEE, LAURA MICHELLE | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19139752 | APPARATUS FOR STOPPING A CUTTING DISC | LEE, LAURA MICHELLE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKando Innovation Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.
Laura Michelle Lee has the most, with 1 of Kando Innovation Limited's pending office actions.