Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Kanvas Biosciences Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Kanvas Biosciences Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a broad spread of examination relative to the total volume of pending applications. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's intellectual property may span different specialized sub-sectors within the broader biotechnology field, requiring a strategy that accounts for varying examination standards across these administrative groups.

YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for 1 of the 2 total pending actions, their individual examination style and historical trends will significantly influence the overall progression of the portfolio. The fact that each of the 2 distinct examiners is handling a single matter suggests a lack of examiner concentration, which may prevent the applicant from leveraging consistent feedback from a single individual across multiple applications.

Practitioners should note that the pending office actions are isolated in different administrative environments. With 2 distinct art units involved, the prosecution team must prepare for potentially divergent prior art citations and legal interpretations. Monitoring the specific tendencies of YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS will be crucial, as this examiner represents a significant portion of the current workload for Kanvas Biosciences Inc.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS 1 65.8% +24.8%
MOEHLMAN, ANDREW TERRY 1 66.3% +61.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17906060 MICROBIAL CONSORTIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE MOEHLMAN, ANDREW TERRY 9d
18171850 HIGHLY MULTIPLEXED DETECTION OF GENE EXPRESSION WITH HYBRIDIZATION CHAIN REACTION YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17906060 MICROBIAL CONSORTIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE MOEHLMAN, ANDREW TERRY 9d
18171850 HIGHLY MULTIPLEXED DETECTION OF GENE EXPRESSION WITH HYBRIDIZATION CHAIN REACTION YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1681 1
1655 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18171850 HIGHLY MULTIPLEXED DETECTION OF GENE EXPRESSION WITH HYBRIDIZATION CHAIN REACTION YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS 1681 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 21, 2023
17906060 MICROBIAL CONSORTIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE MOEHLMAN, ANDREW TERRY 1655 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Sep 09, 2022

Managing Kanvas Biosciences Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month