Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kaptivating Technology LLC operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with a narrow prosecution profile. The company has 1 pending office action currently under review. This 1 matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, DAGNEW, SABA, who is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. For the applicant, this concentration means that all current patent efforts are subject to the discretion of 1 individual.
The prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specialized filing strategy. With 1 busiest examiner pending action assigned to DAGNEW, SABA, the company's entire pending workload is concentrated under 1 individual's oversight. This lack of distribution across multiple art units or examiners simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio but also focuses all prosecution risk on 1 point of contact. The alignment of 1 pending office action with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit creates a centralized prosecution environment.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAGNEW, SABA | 1 | 37.5% | +17.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18980188 | MULTI-STAGE CONTENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM THAT PROFILES USERS AND SELECTS PROMOTIONS | DAGNEW, SABA | 83d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18980188 | MULTI-STAGE CONTENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM THAT PROFILES USERS AND SELECTS PROMOTIONS | DAGNEW, SABA | 3621 | — | Non-Final OA | 83d | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial