Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kardio Diagnostix Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 pending office action is being managed by 1 distinct examiner, WALKER, OLIVIA. Because there is 1 pending office action, WALKER, OLIVIA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action. This indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort for the company's current application.
The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current intellectual property efforts are focused on a specific technical niche handled by a single specialized group at the USPTO. With 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's immediate prosecution strategy is tied to the review of a single individual. This streamlined profile suggests a very specific and localized interaction with the patent office. The company must focus its resources on addressing the specific requirements of this 1 distinct art unit and its assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALKER, OLIVIA | 1 | 35.7% | +75.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19107184 | COMPUTER-ASSISTED SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HEART MURMER CLASSIFICATION | WALKER, OLIVIA | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19107184 | COMPUTER-ASSISTED SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HEART MURMER CLASSIFICATION | WALKER, OLIVIA | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19107184 | COMPUTER-ASSISTED SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HEART MURMER CLASSIFICATION | WALKER, OLIVIA | 3796 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Feb 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial