Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Kardiozis SAS

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kardiozis SAS manages a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, currently facing 3 pending office actions. This volume of activity indicates a more active prosecution phase than portfolios with 1 pending office action. The portfolio is distributed across 3 distinct examiners, which suggests that a variety of technical claims are being pursued simultaneously.

Despite having 3 distinct examiners, the portfolio is concentrated within 2 distinct art units. This indicates that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, the technology remains focused within a limited set of mechanical or medical classifications. The use of 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending office actions means that each case is being handled by a different person, providing multiple examiner perspectives.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SHARMA, YASHITA, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. Because there are 3 pending office actions in total, the workload is spread across the examining corps. This distribution shows that no single examiner dominates the company's prosecution, as each of the 3 distinct examiners is currently handling exactly 1 pending office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHARMA, YASHITA 1 81.8% +24.6%
HOUSTON, ELIZABETH 1 37.6% +42.9%
TYSON, MELANIE RUANO 1 68.4% +18.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18317600 DELIVERY DEVICE, DELIVERY SYSTEM, STENT GRAFT AND A SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHARMA, YASHITA 10d overdue

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17794659 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN ENDOPROSTHESIS TYSON, MELANIE RUANO 180d overdue
17794656 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF ATTACHING A FIBER TO A SURFACE HOUSTON, ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17794659 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN ENDOPROSTHESIS TYSON, MELANIE RUANO 180d overdue
18317600 DELIVERY DEVICE, DELIVERY SYSTEM, STENT GRAFT AND A SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHARMA, YASHITA 10d overdue
17794656 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF ATTACHING A FIBER TO A SURFACE HOUSTON, ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3774 2
3771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18317600 DELIVERY DEVICE, DELIVERY SYSTEM, STENT GRAFT AND A SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHARMA, YASHITA 3774 §102 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending May 15, 2023
17794656 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF ATTACHING A FIBER TO A SURFACE HOUSTON, ELIZABETH 3771 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 22, 2022
17794659 ENDOPROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN ENDOPROSTHESIS TYSON, MELANIE RUANO 3774 §103§112 Non-Final OA 180d overdue Pending Jul 22, 2022

Managing Kardiozis SAS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month